Greenhalgh, RM, Brown, LC, Powell, JT, Thompson, SG, Epstein, D, and United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators (2010). Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 362, 1863-1871.
Parodi, JC, Palmaz, JC, and Barone, HD (1991). Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 5, 491-499.
Lederle, FA, Freischlag, JA, Kyriakides, TC, Padberg, FT, Matsumura, JS, and Kohler, TR (2009). Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 302, 1535-1542.
Broeders, IA, and Blankensteijn, JD (1999). Preoperative imaging of the aortoiliac anatomy in endovascular aneurysm surgery. Semin Vasc Surg. 12, 306-314.
Wyers, MC, Fillinger, MF, Schermerhorn, ML, Powell, RJ, Rzucidlo, EM, and Walsh, DB (2003). Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm without preoperative arteriography. J Vasc Surg. 38, 730-738.
Lee, WA (2007). Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm sizing and case planning using the TeraRecon aquarius workstation. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 41, 61-67.
Iezzi, R, Cotroneo, AR, Filippone, A, Di Fabio, F, Santoro, M, and Storto, ML (2007). MDCT angiography in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: diagnostic impact of slice thickness on detection of endoleaks. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189, 1414-1420.
Rott, A, Boehm, T, Söldner, J, Reichenbach, JR, Heyne, J, and Bartel, M (2002). Computerized modeling based on spiral CT data for noninvasive determination of aortic stent-graft length. J Endovasc Ther. 9, 520-528.
Sobocinski, J, Chenorhokian, H, Maurel, B, Midulla, M, Hertault, A, and Le Roux, M (2013). The benefits of EVAR planning using a 3D workstation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 46, 418-423.
Aziz, I, Lee, J, Lee, JT, Donayre, CE, Walot, I, and Kopchok, G (2003). Accuracy of three-dimensional simulation in the sizing of aortic endoluminal devices. Ann Vasc Surg. 17, 129-136.
Sprouse, LR, Meier, GH, Parent, FN, DeMasi, RJ, Stokes, GK, and LeSar, CJ (2004). Is three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction justified before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?. J Vasc Surg. 40, 443-447.
Müller-Eschner, M, Rengier, F, Partovi, S, Weber, TF, Kopp-Schneider, A, and Geisbüsch, P (2013). Accuracy and variability of semiautomatic centerline analysis versus manual aortic measurement techniques for TEVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 45, 241-247.
Parker, MV, O’Donnell, SD, Chang, AS, Johnson, CA, Gillespie, DL, and Goff, JM (2005). What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg. 41, 199-205.
Chaikof, EL, Blankensteijn, JD, Harris, PL, White, GH, Zarins, CK, and Bernhard, VM (2002). Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 35, 1048-1060.
Schanzer, A, Greenberg, RK, Hevelone, N, Robinson, WP, Eslami, MH, and Goldberg, RJ (2011). Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 123, 2848-2855.
Lederle, FA, Wilson, SE, Johnson, GR, Reinke, DB, Littooy, FN, and Acher, CW (1995). Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 21, 945-952.
Kaladji, A, Lucas, A, Kervio, G, Haigron, P, and Cardon, A (2010). Sizing for endovascular aneurysm repair: clinical evaluation of a new automated three-dimensional software. Ann Vasc Surg. 24, 912-920.
Corriere, MA, Islam, A, Craven, TE, Conlee, TD, Hurie, JB, and Edwards, MS (2014). Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 59, 1224-1231.e3.